Meghan Markle issued brutal Invictus Games warning over security fears

EXCLUSIVE: Meghan Markle was warned that she needs to return to the UK for the Invictus Games in 2027 if she wants to mend her damaged reputation with the British public.

Meghan Markle was urged to return to the UK for the Invictus Games in 2027 as the move could prove to be beneficial on multiple fronts, according to a PR expert.

Prince Harry’s passion project will be returning to his home country for the first time since 2014 after it was announced on Tuesday that Birmingham won the bid to host the event in a competition against US finalist

Washington DC.

However, it’s still uncertain whether Meghan will accompany Harry as the last time she visited the UK was in 2022 when she attended the late Queen Elizabeth’s funeral as the couple are still concerned over their security while in Britain.

Now a PR expert warned the duchess that if she has any hopes of mending her reputation in the UK she should take the leap and, provided there is an adequate security plan in place, she should appear alongside her husband at the major event.

Renae Smith, founder and director of the Atticism, told Express.co.uk that Meghan’s return would not only benefit her image with the British public but would also provide

“valuable exposure” for her own brand, American Riviera Orchard.

Meghan Markle has not travelled to the UK since 2022

She explained: “Meghan’s safety concerns in the UK are debatable; while she may not be universally liked, it is unclear if this translates to actual personal danger. As her PR agent, I would advise her to attend the Invictus Games if she has any hopes of mending her reputation in the UK.

If reputation repair is not a priority for her, then her absence might be more practical.”

Ms Smith claimed that the duchess’s presence would

“demonstrate support” for Harry and the cause he champions, which could potentially result in “enhancing her image as a dedicated partner and advocate for

veterans.

She said: “This solidarity could resonate well with the public and improve her popularity.

“Currently, she is often perceived as seeking the limelight rather than being a supportive partner. By attending and allowing Harry to be the primary focus, she could shift this narrative significantly.”

The PR specialist added that attending such a high-profile event could also boost her brand’s exposure and future endeavours, however, any decisions should be leveraged with a “comprehensive security plan” to address any

threats.

Ms Smith explained: “Attending such a high-profile event could provide valuable exposure for her own brand,

Prince Harry’s Invictus Games will be returning to the UK in 2027 (Image: Getty)

“However, these potential benefits must be weighed against her concerns for safety. If she is genuinely worried, a comprehensive security plan should be in place to address any threats.

“If the risks are deemed manageable for her, her attendance could be a powerful statement and an

opportunity to positively influence public perception.”

Prince Harry brought legal action against the Home Office over the security arrangements for himself and his family when they are in the UK.

The duke contested the Home Office’s February 2020 decision that he should receive a different degree of protection when he returned to the UK after he quit his royal duties.

Last year, he said in a statement: “It was with great sadness to both of us that my wife and I felt forced to step

back from this role and leave the country in 2020. The UK

He lost the case back in February with High Court judge

Sir Peter Lane finding that “there has not been any unlawfulness in reaching the decision” to revise his security, adding: “Any departure from the policy was justified. The decision was not irrational. The decision was not marred by procedural unfairness.”

In April, he lost his initial bid to appeal and was ordered to pay 90 percent of the Home Office’s legal costs.

But an order by Lord Justice Bean, dated May 23, showed that the duke was allowed to challenge Sir Peter’s dismissal at the Court of Appeal.